STATE INSURANCE – Delay, Deny, Defend?

I was sent this information and it looks EXACTLY like the behaviour of STATE INSURANCE in dealing with our claim! Delay, Deny, Defend is the title of a book by Jay FEINMAN in the US about the policy in Insurance companies trying to increase their profits. It is fascinating, disgusting and highly damaging to the Insurance industries image in the public’s eyes.

State Insurance use this policy to avoid paying claims!

An excerpt from the book follows:-

Insurance is the great protector of the standard of living of the American middle class. A good job provides the means to acquire a home, a car, a college education for the children, and a comfortable retirement, and insurance secures those things against the uncertainties of life. Houses will burn, but homeowners insurance furnishes funds to rebuild. Cars will crash, but auto insurance pays medical bills and repair costs and guards against potentially massive liability to other people who are injured. Illness, injury, and death will occur, but health insurance, disability insurance, and life insurance remove the burden of cost and replace the lost earnings of the breadwinner.

Insurance has come a long way in five thousand years, from the time when Babylonian merchants found investors who agreed to accept the risk of cargo lost at sea in return for a payment, a transaction that would develop into marine insurance. Today insurance in the United States is a trillion-dollar industry, with 2,700 property/casualty insurance companies collecting $440 billion in premiums and paying $250 billion in claims each year. (Property/casualty insurance mostly protects against property damage and liability to others; “personal lines property/casualty” is largely auto and homeowners insurance, the subjects of this book.) State Farm, the industry’s giant, has forty-two million policies in force and processes over twelve million claims each year.

Insurance is the great protector of the standard of living of the American middle class, but only when it works. Purchasing an insurance policy is less like buying a product and more like receiving a promise. In return for the policyholder’s payment of a premium, the insurance company promises to accept the risks of financial loss that the policyholder otherwise could not bear. As a formal matter the promise to indemnify the insured against loss is embodied in the policy document, often fifty pages of eight-point type that is seldom read and less often understood, but the real promise is to provide security against loss. Long before the GEICO gecko promised to save you 15 percent or more on car insurance, the iconic slogans of insurance company advertising expressed that real promise: “Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.” “You’re in good hands with Allstate.”

Insurance doesn’t work when the insurance company fails to honor the terms of the policy and its promise of security through the strategy that has become known as “delay, deny, defend.” The company delays payment of a claim, denies all or part of a valid claim, or aggressively defends litigation the policyholder is forced to bring to get what he is rightfully owed. When insurance doesn’t work, the consequences are more severe than when any other kind of company fails to keep its promise. If a homeowner hires someone to paint his house and the painter never shows up, the homeowner can take his money and hire someone else. If the insurance company refuses to pay a claim, it is too late to go elsewhere for another policy; no company will write a policy that will pay for fire damage that has already occurred.

Delay, deny, defend violates the rules for handling claims that are recognized by every company, taught to adjusters, and embodied in law. Within the vast bureaucracy of insurance companies, actuaries assess risks, underwriters price policies and evaluate prospective policyholders, and agents market policies. The claims department’s only job is to pay what is owed, no more but no less. A classic text used to train adjusters, James Markham’s The Claims Environment, states the principle: “The essential function of a claim department is to fulfill the insurance company’s promise, as set forth in the insurance policy. . . . The claim function should ensure the prompt, fair, and efficient delivery of this promise.”

Beginning in the 1990s, many major insurance companies reconsidered this understanding of the claims process. The insight was simple. An insurance company’s greatest expense is what it pays out in claims. If it pays out less in claims, it keeps more in profits. Therefore, the claims department became a profit center rather than the place that kept the company’s promise.

A major step in this shift occurred when Allstate and other companies hired the megaconsulting firm McKinsey & Company to develop new strategies for handling claims. McKinsey saw claims as a “zero-sum game,” with the policyholder and the company competing for the same dollars. No longer would each claim be treated on its merits. Instead, computer systems would be put in place to set the amounts policyholders would be offered, claimants would be deterred from hiring lawyers to help with their claims, and settlements would be offered on a take-it-or- litigate basis. If Allstate moved from “Good Hands” to “Boxing Gloves,” as McKinsey described it, policyholders would either take a lowball offer from the good hands people or face the boxing gloves of extended litigation.

How widespread is delay, deny, defend? How often is it that insurance doesn’t work? There are two answers: too widespread and too often, and no one knows.

The story of delay, deny, defend is easy to understand but hard to discover and document. It is easy to understand that insurance companies make more money when they pay less out in claims, and as with other industries, from chain restaurants to Internet sales, they have become more systematic about the ways in which they make money in recent decades. But while insurance companies like to shape the public’s perception of them through advertising, they are notoriously unwilling to disclose information about their internal workings, especially information that shows they do not always deliver on their promises. Companies spend a great deal of money on advertising that they will fulfill their promise to provide security for their policyholders, but they also spend a great deal of money on lawyers to mask the times when that security fails.

(Full except here for download in PDF format!)

It all sounds so familiar, STATE INSURANCE clearly use this policy or an adaption of it, there is no other explanation of the incredible delays that have taken place in our case! Be warned when insuring with STATE INSURANCE, it is their apparent company policy NOT TO PAY some claims!

Now why would they take this policy, as usual the reason is MONEY! Profit for the shareholders, more salaries for the Loss Adjusters and Investigators. Watch this video of Jay Feinman talking about Delay, Deny, Defend and the advantages to the Insurance company.

Clearly STATE INSURANCE don’t see customers as important, their suffering in conditions like ours is ignored compared to PROFIT!

7 Responses to “STATE INSURANCE – Delay, Deny, Defend?”

  1. Glen Twellawny says:

    Saw your story on a blog here!
    We had same problem with Allstate, case is one of the ones detailed in Jay’s great book!
    Most people in the States now check the claims performance of an insurer before taking out cover, it really hit Allstate after our case when the facts were revealed to the public.
    We got our claim dealt with and a good settlement but it was painful all round, Allstate sucks and it looks like your company sucks too!
    Soc it to um!

  2. Edgar Stealson has published your case details on several blogs and on his Facebook page! It is creating quite a stir here. I have been a good friend of Edgar for many years.
    I have BIG news for you!
    There are thousands of US citizens with property interests in New Zealand, almost all insuring locally. I’d estimate the largest number with you State Insurance who claim the biggest market sector. Your information shows that all this property is insured to a standard not acceptable to many of us.
    Over the next year, your article will have a big effect on this, my son works for one of the biggest Lloyd’s brokers over in Dallas. He has spoken to one of his syndicate contacts at Lloyd’s who is now actively putting together a Lloyd’s backed policy for property in New Zealand to be marketed to all overseas owners of property there.
    Costs will be competitive and the claims process will be guaranteed to meet Lloyd’s standards.
    Further details will be forwarded in the next month, preliminary publicity of the scheme is underway and first policies are expected to be issued in April’12.
    Probably won’t help your case much but it sure will hurt the tiny New Zealand Insurance business!

  3. ChrisR says:

    Clive.
    That is brilliant! State only seem to care about profit, this is certain to hit their bottom line hard over the next few years. Could dwarf the settlement to us and it will keep hurting them!
    Thank your son for me and I hope the Lloyd’s make lots of money with ths policy.

  4. It is sad and upsetting for you, life must go on and you will get justice soon!
    I read your story and know that you are doing the best you can, let the World know of the dishonorable actions of this Insurance company.
    It will start to reduce their trade and that will cause them to consider the value of the client base which will move to other more reputable companies.
    Don’t give in – keep up the pressure – I can see that you have thousands of comments so lots of people are reading your story – well done, it will hurt them more as each day passes.
    I will pray for you and your family

  5. I have crossed New Zealand off my list of places I’d like to retire to following reading your account of life there.
    NZ is portrayed as a Green country with people who get on well and have created a caring society but your story blows that whole fable to pieces. Just one family having a nightmare like yours should never happen in any civilised country at all.

    State Insurance are I understand part of the IAG group from Australia. I have contacts there at high level, they will, I hope, be shocked by the events in NZ! The potential effect on their share value from the publicity you are causing will be of serious concern to the Board.

    At the end of the day, you need a caring solution, compassion and a sensible approach to your future. After all this time if they had evidence of your involvement it would have been used to destroy your claim, they have nothing and they are the ones who must fear publicity more than anything!

    In our modern society where money is all important and bottom line profits for shareholders getting harder to produce, weaker businesses will resort to this sort of behaviour. Take strength from the knowledge that State is displaying weakness by the Delay, Deny and Defend policy that they are applying to your claim. Publish every word and let them justify their actions in the Courts if need be but the damages you will receive for mental and physical distress will be huge when they lose the case as they inevitably will.

    Good luck!

  6. James Kato says:

    We too have a holiday home in New Zealand and have spent many happy years escaping there for the winter.
    We too have been insured by State Insurance but we have changed to another insurer after reading your blog.
    It was fortunate that we saw it just before the renewal was processed, thanks to Edgar Stealson’s publicity here in the States.

    We hope you get a good result very soon.

  7. Rossana says:

    Awful mess but delay, deny, defend has hurt the companies that ran it here in the States so what you are doing is the right thing.

    Your page comes up real well on Google if you search State claims, State Insurance and most other terms of that ilk so your SEO doesn’t need the help I was ready to offer – well done. They cannot take the stress either, I guess it is tough for you but hang on in there!

    As a tech note, I see you have this blog on a mirror site here in the US, not sure your counter code will show a correct reading if the code doesn’t match the URL.

Leave a Reply